Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Crime

Federal Trial Court in Georgia Denies Mark Meadows’ Move in Election Interference Case

Georgia's Federal Trial Court Rejects Mark Meadows' Request in Election Interference Case (Photo: Google)

The judge at the federal trial court concluded that Meadows had gone beyond the responsibilities of a White House chief of staff by actively participating in political activities for Trump’s campaign.

The judge presiding over the federal trial court determined that Meadows had exceeded the duties expected of a White House chief of staff by actively engaging in political activities for Trump’s campaign. (Photo: Google)

U.S. District Court Judge Steve Jones has ruled that Former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows failed to meet the criteria for transferring his Georgia election interference case to a federal trial court. The judge found that Meadows had exceeded the responsibilities of a White House chief of staff by involving himself in political activities for Trump’s campaign.

According to an article published by Forbes, former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, in his Georgia election interference case, failed to meet the threshold for moving the case to federal trial court, as ruled by U.S. District Court Judge Steve Jones.

The judge determined that Meadows had exceeded the duties of a White House chief of staff by engaging in political activities for Trump’s campaign.

This ruling could have implications for Trump, as his legal team may make a similar dismissal request. If successful, it could help Trump avoid a televised federal trial court, find a more favorable jury pool, and potentially pardon himself if reelected as president after a conviction.

READ ALSO: Student Loan Forgiveness: New Rules Of PSLF Program To Provide More Benefits To Borrowers

Meadows argued that, as a federal official during the alleged violation, he qualified for a statute allowing the removal of state-level prosecution to federal trial court.

According to an article published by NBC News, however, Judge Jones cited the Hatch Act, which prohibits civil-service employees from using their authority to influence elections, even though no Hatch Act violation was charged against Meadows in the federal trial court.

Other defendants in the same case, including Jeffrey Clark, Georgia state Sen. Shawn Still, Cathy Latham, and David Shafer, have also requested to move their cases to the federal trial court, anticipating a friendlier jury pool.

Hearings for some of these requests are scheduled for September 18 in the federal trial court. All 19 defendants in the Georgia election interference case have pleaded not guilty in the federal trial court, with Meadows facing charges of violating Georgia’s RICO law and soliciting a public official to violate their oath.

Trump himself faces multiple indictments as well in federal trial court.

READ ALSO: Murder Suspect Escapes Custody At D.C. Hospital: Manhunt Underway

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Crime

Texas man Eduardo Arevalo confessed of strangling his pregnant sister for being an “embarrassment” to the family in 2019. Texas Man’s 8 Months Pregnant...

Crime

Cameron Wright, a 22-year-old was sentenced with 55 years in prison for killing, dismembering and throwing girlfriend’s body at separate locations according to his...

Crime

Twenty years after being charged with murder in the toddler’s choking death, a Texas babysitter Rosa Jimenez had the charges against her dropped. 99...

Crime

North Carolina Shooting Incident: Father Shot Truck Driver After His 17-Year-Old Son Was Fatally Hit In a North Carolina shooting incident, a father is...