Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?


Guaranteed Income for Trans People Program: Controversy Erupts Over San Francisco

(Photo from: Los Angeles Times)

San Francisco finds itself embroiled in controversy as its Guaranteed Income for Trans People Program faces legal challenges from residents who deem it unconstitutional and discriminatory. The initiative, launched by Mayor London Breed in November 2022, aimed to provide financial support to transgender individuals in the city.

(Photo from: Los Angeles Times)

The Inception of the Program

Since its inception, the Guaranteed Income for Trans People Program has stirred debate regarding its legality and ethical implications. Launched by Mayor London Breed, the initiative sought to address financial insecurities among transgender communities in San Francisco. The program, which disburses $1,200 monthly for up to 18 months, targets low-income transgender individuals, particularly those from Black and Latino backgrounds, to alleviate economic hardships within the community.

However, the program’s implementation has sparked a lawsuit led by several San Francisco residents who argue that it violates the state constitution by offering preferential treatment based on gender identity and ethnicity.

Judicial Watch, a nonprofit legal group assisting the plaintiffs, accused the Guaranteed Income for Trans People Program of discriminating against non-transgender people and preferring certain racial and gender groups.

READ ALSO: Child Tax Credit Expansion: Benefit Low- And Middle-Income Families!

 Legal and Ethical Concerns

As the legal battle unfolds, questions surrounding the constitutionality and fairness of the Guaranteed Income for Trans People Program continue to surface, casting a shadow over the city’s efforts to support its transgender population. Critics argue that the program’s exclusive focus on transgender minorities overlooks the broader spectrum of individuals experiencing financial hardship, potentially exacerbating tensions within the community and raising concerns about the equitable distribution of resources.

Despite assertions from city officials regarding the program’s intention to uplift marginalized groups, the controversy underscores the complexities of balancing social justice initiatives with legal obligations and ethical considerations.

READ ALSO: Up To $3,487 Alaska Food Stamps Snap Benefits Will Arrive In 8 Days- Are You Qualified?

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like


Texas man Eduardo Arevalo confessed of strangling his pregnant sister for being an “embarrassment” to the family in 2019. Texas Man’s 8 Months Pregnant...


Even though the last wave of the federal government stimulus checks was distributed over two years ago, at least three distinct states are still...


The US is expected to distribute further stimulus funds through a variety of initiatives. Direct cash, tax refund, or some other kind of assistance...


Cameron Wright, a 22-year-old was sentenced with 55 years in prison for killing, dismembering and throwing girlfriend’s body at separate locations according to his...